Editorial: Catholic leaders shamefully silent as Trump, Vance lie about immigrants

The texts are the foundation of Catholic social teaching, from the encyclical Rerum Novarum promulgated in 1891 through every succeeding papacy and especially today, with Pope Francis' unyielding and insistent advocacy for migrants from the very opening months of his pontificate.

The Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc., or CLINIC, an organization founded decades ago by the U.S. bishops, notes that Catholic teaching "recognizes a range of human rights for newcomers, based on their God-given dignity that extends far beyond those recognized by individual nations or international bodies."

Further, the church "teaches that civil authority draws its legitimacy from protecting and defending human rights and the 'common good of the entire human family.' In this context, service to newcomers constitutes an obligation to persons of faith, not an option."

Yet our feckless religious leaders have concluded they have another option: shamefully sitting out this battle in silence, on the sidelines.

No version of the immigration lies is more instructive than the ongoing use by Trump and Vance of the calumny that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, are eating neighbors' dogs and cats and otherwise causing a major disruption to life in that community.

The women behind the false accusations publicly admitted their error and expressed deep regrets for the problems they caused the Haitian community. Officials at the local and state levels, including the Republican governor, have deemed as utterly false the story and the characterizations of Haitians legally residing in that community. Springfield is the national story writ small, an example of what happens when public leaders spend their political capital ginning up hate.

The Republican nominees have chosen not to let a rampaging viral lie go to waste. Vance, confronted with the truth, engaged in a kind of language alchemy.

"The American media totally ignored this stuff until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes," he said, according to an NPR report. "If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that's what I'm going to do."

How noble. Except that the suffering only became greater for the targets of his defamation. As a result, the town of Springfield experienced numerous bomb threats and new levels of fear.

We know the bishops have pronounced incessantly and spent untold millions attempting to change attitudes and laws regarding such issues as abortion and contraception. On the matter of immigration lies, their comments have been few and hardly adequate to the attacks on this vulnerable population.

Why, then, the silence on this life issue?

Immigration is not about individual conscience wrestling with whether to contravene church teaching. No, this is about a former president seeking a second term who would use the power of office and the instruments of the state to mandate inhumanity toward millions of immigrants among us.

Will we be required to stand by and simply witness the vilification of others, many of whom now attend our churches? Will we be forced to witness gratuitous insults like "floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean," a reference to Puerto Rico made at Trump's Madison Square Garden rally? Is it our lot to stand by helplessly and accept the worst that can be said of — and the worst consequences for — the most vulnerable among us?

Silence.

Our bishops have yet to call out the lies and the liars. They have failed to use whatever moral authority they possess to counter the calumny. They have abandoned immigrants, whom they so often and proudly claim as our own, and left them vulnerable to fickle political winds and the awesome power of the state.

In their silence, do they give consent?